Current Issues

Border Security & Sanctuary City

Angel Family Representation

Landmark is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold President Trump’s emergency use of military funds for the construction of a border barrier in areas of high drug and human trafficking. The Sierra Club and ACLU challenged the transfer of funds because the new barrier will interfere with their hiking, recreational, and aesthetic enjoyment of the land.

Landmark’s brief argues that when the President acts in matters of foreign affairs and in matters of national defense, he operates at the height of his powers. Our founders recognized the importance of executive authority in these matters – the President’s greatest responsibility is to ensure the safety of our nation. And he alone can act quickly when our nation is threatened.

The threats posed by unsecured borders are real. Landmark represents families of loved ones killed by illegal immigrants. The interests of these Angel Families in securing our border take precedence over the interests of those who are attempting to halt construction of the wall. Those opposing the President claim that the aesthetic, recreational and environmental interests are more important than securing the border and halting illegal drug trade.

We disagreed in the Ninth Circuit, where we argued that the President is using his inherent powers to take effective and necessary action to defend the nation’s borders.

It is up to the Supreme Court to set the matter straight. Look for updates in the coming months on whether the Court has accepted this case and whether our judicial system will prioritize the needs of its citizens over the special interests of the left.

Preserving the Constitution

Landmark Fights for Donor Privacy

Your privacy is of the highest concern to Landmark Legal Foundation. That is why we joined 38 conservative legal and public policy organizations in challenging new rules imposed by the states of California and New York that will compel charitable organizations to release personal information of their largest financial supporters. We argue that these regulations violated your First Amendment rights to free speech and association. The case is Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra and you can read the brief the Foundation joined here.

U.S. Supreme Court Weighs Compelled Employee
Financial Support of Public Sector Unions

Landmark joined other freedom based legal groups and organizations supporting the rights of public employees wanting freedom from compelled financial support of public sector labor unions and their radical political agenda. The case is Thompson v. Marietta Education Association and you can read the brief here.

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio’s Process
For Protecting The Integrity Of Its Voter Rolls

Read the OpEd in USA Today by Landmark’s President Pete Hutchison here.
​Landmark’s amicus brief in support of the State of Ohio is available here.
Listen to Landmark’s President Pete Hutchison’s Interview on the Mark Levin Show.

Janus v. AFSCME: High Court Restores First
Amendment Rights to Public Employees

Read Landmark’s Scotusblog Analysis here.​
Read Landmark’s Brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Files Amicus Brief
in Support of Seila Law LLC

Read the brief here.
View the  here.
View the Certificate of Compliance here.

Landmark Chairman Mark Levin Addresses The Mueller Report

Watch the video here.

Landmark Urges the Supreme Court to Decide Whether Massachusetts’s Ban on Corporate Political Spending Violates the First Amendment

View the brief here.

Landmark Files Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners
in State National Bank of Big Springs, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al.

View the brief here.

Voter Integrity

Landmark and PILF File Joint Brief
Supporting Ballot Integrity in Texas

View the brief here.

Landmark Urges Supreme Court
to Uphold Arizona Ballot Harvesting Protections

View the brief here.

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio’s Process
For Protecting The Integrity Of Its Voter Rolls

Read the OpEd in USA Today by Landmark’s President Pete Hutchison here.
​Landmark’s amicus brief in support of the State of Ohio is available here.
Listen to Landmark’s President Pete Hutchison’s Interview on the Mark Levin Show.

Texas Voting Laws Defended by Landmark and PILF

View the brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Defends Virginia Voting
Protections Even Though The Commonwealth Won’t

View Landmark’s blog post here.
​View the brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Requests Federal Investigation
Into California Voter Registration Improprieties

View the complaint here.

LANDMARK OPED: California Ignores Non-Citizen Voter Registrations

View the article here.

Landmark Files Complaint With California
Dept. of Motor Vehicles For Failure To Maintain Accurate Voter Rolls

View the complaint here.

Landmark’s California Voter Registration Investigation

Landmark files complaint with the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security Re: California’s Failure to Maintain Accurate Voter Rolls.  View the complaint here.

View exhibits 1-5

View exhibits 6 part 1

View exhibit 6 part 2

View exhibits 7-9


Landmark Legal Foundation Seeks Probe of Leaks About
Investigations Into Trump Campaign Ties to Russia

April 26, 2017

Landmark Legal Foundation announced today that it has asked the inspectors general of six federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to investigate dozens of illegal leaks to journalists of classified information relating to electronic surveillance of individuals associated with the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump. View Investigation Report

Supplemental Request for Investigation

July 25, 2017

Request for investigation, leaking surveillance activity conducted in accordance with foreign intelligence surveillance court warrants. View Request

Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections Demand Letter

September 20, 2016Landmark Legal Foundation recently sent this demand letter to the Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections. The Foundation demanded that the Board distribute to Virginia’s 113 voting registrars the latest data on voting record changes assembled by Crosscheck, an organization to which 25 member states supply the latest updates to voting records generated by individuals who die, move, change their names, are convicted of felonies, or otherwise change their voting registrations. The majority of the members of Virginia Board of Elections is opposed to doing this.

View Memo


We are truly facing existential threats to our individual rights and liberties, the Constitution, and our national character. If unchallenged, this assault on our very way of life will ruin our great nation. With your financial and moral support, Landmark is not going to let that happen without a fight. Will you join us?