Yesterday, Landmark filed an amicus brief in a case called Consumers’ Research v. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Consumers’ Research is...
After Attempted Carjacker Foiled, Landmark Calls On Congress To Protect The Judiciary
Early Tuesday morning, U.S. Marshals shot a would-be carjacker outside of Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s house after he pointed a gun at one of the...
Justice Thomas’ Concurrence in Trump v. United States Questions Legality of Jack Smith Appointment as Special Counsel
On Monday, July 1, the Supreme Court released its decision in the case of Trump v. United States. Along with the historic presidential immunity...
Landmark’s Statement on Supreme Court’s Decision in Loper v. Raimondo
Today, the Supreme Court formally revoked a long-standing judicial doctrine (known as the Chevron deference) that obligated courts to defer to...
Landmark Legal Foundation’s Statement on Moore v. United States
Today, in Moore v. United States, the Supreme Court fumbled an important tax case that would have made wealth tax schemes harder for Congress to...
The Supreme Court Upholds South Carolina Redistricting
Recently, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to South Carolina’s new redistricting plan in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the...
Trump’s Accelerated Pathway to the U.S. Supreme Court
Mark Levin, Landmark’s Chairman of the Board, has proposed a unique theory as to how Donald Trump should appeal yesterday’s verdict in the New York...
Landmark Urges Supreme Court to Shield Firearms Firms from Ruling, Citing Broad Industry Impact
Landmark urges the Supreme Court to protect American firearms companies from a disruptive First Circuit opinion that threatens many American...
Landmark Statement on CFPB v. Community Financial
Today, the Supreme Court failed to rein in one of the most powerful agencies you’ve never heard of: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)....